Rereading
Once in a while, I decide to reread favorite books from the past. Mostly these have been books I’ve read in the past few years. I’ve found audiobooks are a good way to revisit the favorites and sometimes they bring out even more from the books. Then there are books I read when a teenager, and sometimes even younger. I have such good memories of those books and yet I was a very different person at the time. I wonder if those books will stand up after so many years. I must admit to not revisiting many of those books.
Today I was scanning a list of books of a Goodreads friend and came across Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach. I really liked that when I read it as a teenager. Then I read Illusions by the same writer and particularly loved it. I read and reread it a few times during my youth. But would I still love it now as I did then? Is it always a good idea to revisit those books? If I read it today, I might not feel the same way and then the “illusion” would be destroyed, leaving a different memory from earlier. I guess it’s a bit like watching television shows you liked in your youth but now make you cringe.
More recently I got the ebook version of Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier because it was one of those books from my youth that left a major impression. I have recently started my second reading and so far it’s been quite good. I imagine this is one book I will be just as satisfied with the second time around. In fact, I may actually appreciate it so much more with the many extra years of maturity.
In my previous post, I mentioned reading books by Victoria Holt as a teenager. A couple of years ago I did reread one and I did find it stood up after all these years. I think it was one of her best ones, so I guess that was a good choice. I think I also sought one by Phyllis Whitney that was still okay although it did not leave much of an impression. I know there were some of her books that I really loved but do they still work for me as they did then?
Many years ago I revisited From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler that was a magical book for me as a child. Reading the book as a probably forty-something adult isn’t quite the same as for an eight or nine year old. I’m sure I reread this a few times during my childhood and it held up. But it felt less than magical to the much older me. It was still good to read but more in a nostalgic way. Fortunately, this hasn’t spoiled the book for me and I do still have fond memories of it.
I’m not so sure a book like Illusions would hold for me. I remember it being kind of magical too, but I somehow feel it would fall under a different scrutiny were I to read it today and it really would ruin that memory. Therefore it’s unlikely that’s a book I will revisit again.
One Comment
Leslie R. Waggoner III
Many time it will be about the comlexity and the revelation of things mist that will enrich a second read. I have many novels that I have read many times, On a Pale Horse and Bearing an Hourglass, both by Piers Anthony—Lord of the Rings, The Amber Chronicles by Roger Zelazny all were reread at one point. Children of the Atom by Wilmar H. Shiras is one I continually go back to (it’s short).